Control of Vibration at Work Regulations
Key takeaways
The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005 require employers to manage health risks from both hand-arm and whole-body vibration. Daily exposure action and limit values define when interventions are needed. Employers must carry out risk assessments, implement controls, provide training and health surveillance, and engage with workers in managing these risks.
Background
The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005, a UK Statutory Instrument under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (SI 2005/1093), came into force on 6 July 2005 to protect employees from health hazards associated with vibration at work. These regulations address two key forms of vibration: hand-arm vibration, arising from the use of hand-held or hand-guided tools, and whole-body vibration, typically transmitted through seats or by standing on vibrating machinery
Central to the regulations are defined exposure action values (EAVs) and exposure limit values (ELVs). Employers must act to reduce exposure once the action value is reached and must ensure the limit value is not exceeded.
Employers are required to undertake a suitable and sufficient risk assessment to identify employees at risk, consider the magnitude and duration of exposure, and evaluate the vulnerability of certain individuals. Based on this assessment, the employer must implement appropriate control measures following a hierarchy of control. This may include substituting equipment, using low-vibration tools, changing work processes, introducing rest breaks or job rotation, and keeping equipment well-maintained
Where the risk assessment shows a risk to health, the regulations mandate health surveillance to detect early signs of disorders like hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) or vibration-related back issues. Should health effects arise, employers must review controls, provide advice, and consider assigning alternative work. Employers must also inform and train employees about the risks, control measures, exposure values, findings from assessments, and how to spot and report symptoms. Worker consultation is also required, ensuring that those affected are involved in the risk management process.
Failing to comply with these regulations can lead to enforcement action by the Health and Safety Executive, including prosecution. Cases have emerged where organisations have been fined for neglecting to manage vibration risks appropriately.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
Your guide to The Construction Reset at UKCW Birmingham.
Accommodating the Victorian and Edwardian working woman. Book review.
Rethinking passive fire protection in design
PFP demands the same level of design rigour as structure or services.
38% of Gen Zs feel safe when a fire door is wedged open.
Stunning images from around the world
Shortlist for CIOB’s Art of Building photography competition.
Guidance for conversion of traditional pre-1919 stone buildings.
Industrial heritage in the Ruhr
A marked difference to the fate of industrial landscapes in the UK.
Communities will be able to build their own clean energy.
Why diversity and inclusion matters for SMEs
CIOB’s D&I Charter shows how practical changes can support long-term growth.
Cut electricity bills to power growth
Coalition sends joint letter to the Chancellor.
Gasholders: a history in pictures. Book review.
Recognition, influence and growth
SocEnv identifies three strategic pillars in new strategy to 2045.

















